For the RHS Center to function as a standard — not just another analytics product — it has to be governed like one. That means transparent methodology, anti-exclusivity by structure, independence from product affiliation, and a published accountability framework.
These are the commitments that separate a standard from a vendor score. They are structural choices, designed into how the RHS Center operates rather than added as policy after the fact.
The scoring framework, its weights, and its version history are intended to be published openly. Updates are announced and comparison across versions is documented — the FICO 8 / 9 / 10 governance model.
No insurer receives exclusive market access. No product manufacturer receives exclusive certification. Universal availability is a structural commitment, not a marketing line.
Methodology versioning, dispute resolution, and certification decisions are designed to be governed independently of any single commercial relationship.
Because the score follows the property, the parties it touches — including homeowners — are intended to have a defined path to dispute a score and request re-inspection.
The standard is anchored to the address. Property data and personal identity are separated by design, consistent with PIPEDA and Quebec’s Law 25.
The RHS Center was incubated by a Quebec-based nanotechnology company developing roof treatment products. The Center is independently governed and applies its methodology to all qualifying products on equal terms.
A standard that changes silently is not a standard. The RH Score is built to evolve the way credit scoring did — openly, on numbered versions that every party can reason about.
The most important thing a standard can do is disclose its own conflicts before anyone has to ask.